Generative AI Adoption in Higher Education: Aligning Academic Tasks, Technology, and Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.6981Keywords:
Generative AI, Higher Education, Task Technology Fit, Behavioural Intention, Academic PerformanceAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping education by transforming teaching, learning, and assessment practices, making it vital to examine its effective integration within academic contexts. This study explores the adoption of GenAI tools and their impact on academic performance among ICT students at a private Australian higher education institute. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Task–Technology Fit (TTF) frameworks, it investigates how behavioural intentions, pedagogical factors, and technological characteristics collectively influence students’ use of GenAI and academic performance. A positivist, quantitative design was adopted, using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire completed by 235 students across Melbourne and Sydney campuses. Data were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings highlight three insights. First, Perceived Behavioural Control emerged as the strongest predictor of students’ intention to adopt GenAI, highlighting that confidence and a sense of control are critical drivers of adoption. Attitudes also positively influenced intention, while social influence was weaker, underscoring the need to strengthen students’ self-efficacy and AI literacy. Second, TTF, shaped by pedagogical task variables and technological characteristics, directly affected both use and academic performance. Extending TTF to include learning outcomes and assessment methods demonstrates that curriculum design is central to technology-task alignment. Third, TTF emerged as the strongest driver of academic performance, exceeding both behavioural intention and actual use. Meaningful gains occur when GenAI is effectively aligned with tasks. By integrating TPB and TTF, this study provides a comprehensive framework for GenAI adoption and guidance for embedding AI into higher education.
References
Abdekhoda, M., Dehnad, A., & Zarei, J. (2022). Factors influencing adoption of e-learning in healthcare: integration of UTAUT and TTF model. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02060-9
ACS. (2015). ACS Core Body of Knowledge for ICT Professionals (CBOK). www.acs.org.au
Ahadzadeh, A. S., Wu, S. L., & Xu, S. (2024). Exploring Academic Intentions for ChatGPT: A Perspective from the Theory of Planned Behavior. ASR: Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.12982/CMUJASR.2024.016
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior.
Alamri, M. M., Almaiah, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2020). The Role of Compatibility and Task-Technology Fit (TTF): On Social Networking Applications (SNAs) Usage as Sustainability in Higher Education. IEEE Access, 8, 161668–161681. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021944
Aldreabi, H., Dahdoul, N. K. S., Alhur, M., Alzboun, N., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2025). Determinants of Student Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 23(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.23.1.3599
Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Foroughi, B., Al-Qaysi, N., Mansoor, D., Beheshti, A., & Ali, N. (2025). Evaluating the influence of generative AI on students’ academic performance through the lenses of TPB and TTF using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13485-w
Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M. S., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2020). Task-technology fit and technology acceptance model application to structure and evaluate the adoption of social media in academia. IEEE Access, 8, 78427–78440. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990420
Al-Mamary, Y. H., Alfalah, A. A., Alshammari, M. M., & Abubakar, A. A. (2024). Exploring factors influencing university students’ intentions to use ChatGPT: analysing task-technology fit theory to enhance behavioural intentions in higher education. Future Business Journal, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00406-5
Almusawi, H. A., & Durugbo, C. M. (2024). Linking task-technology fit, innovativeness, and teacher readiness using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 14899–14928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12440-x
Al-Qaysi, N., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Iranmanesh, M., Ahmad, A., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2025). Determinants of ChatGPT Use and its Impact on Learning Performance: An Integrated Model of BRT and TPB. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(9), 5462–5474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2361210
Al‐rahmi, A. M., Al‐rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Almutairy, S., & Al‐adwan, A. S. (2021). Exploring the factors affecting mobile learning for sustainability in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147893
Al-Rahmi, A. M., Shamsuddin, A., Wahab, E., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., & Almutairy, S. (2022). Integrating the Role of UTAUT and TTF Model to Evaluate Social Media Use for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.905968
Alturki, U., & Aldraiweesh, A. (2023). Integrated TTF and self-determination theories in higher education: The role of actual use of the massive open online courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1108325
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2021). E-learning acceptance: the role of task–technology fit as sustainability in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116450
An, Y., Yu, J. H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
AQF. (2013). Australian qualifications framework. Australian Qualifications Framework Council. https://www.aqf.edu.au/publication/aqf-second-edition
Ayyash, M. M., Alkhateeb, M. A. A., & Abdalla, R. A. M. (2024). Smartphone-based learning and academic performance in higher education institutions: extending task-technology-fit with technology readiness constructs. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 36(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIL.2024.140260
Ayyoub, A. M., Khlaif, Z. N., Shamali, M., Abu Eideh, B., Assali, A., Hattab, M. K., Barham, K. A., & Bsharat, T. R. K. (2025). Advancing higher education with GenAI: factors influencing educator AI literacy. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1530721
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364.
Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK).
Cabellos, B., de Aldama, C., & Pozo, J. I. (2024). University teachers’ beliefs about the use of generative artificial intelligence for teaching and learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468900
Chakraborty, D., Troise, C., & Bresciani, S. (2025). Exploring consumer intentions to continue: Integrating task technology fit and social technology fit in generative AI based shopping platforms. Technovation, 142, 103189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103189
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Khorana, S., Mikalef, P., & Sharma, A. (2023). Assessing Organizational Users’ Intentions and Behavior to AI Integrated CRM Systems: a Meta-UTAUT Approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(4), 1299–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10181-1
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: a case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6187–6203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge.
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Almogren, A. S., & Vighio, M. S. (2024). Investigating factors affecting teachers’ training through mobile learning: Task technology fit perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 14553–14589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12434-9
D’Ambra, J., Wilson, C. S., & Akter, S. (2013). Application of the task-technology fit model to structure and evaluate the adoption of E-books by academics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22757
Diao, Y., Li, Z., Zhou, J., Gao, W., & Gong, X. (2024). A Meta-analysis of College Students’ Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2409.06712. http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.06712
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21.
Eyal, L. (2025). A Curriculum Redesign Framework for the Generative AI Era: The Core-Leveraging-Expansion Model. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202504.2216.v1
Falebita, O. S., & Kok, P. J. (2025). Undergraduate Intentions of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Learning: Influence of Attitude and Perceived Behavioral Control. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 21(1), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/CGP/v21i01/169-188
Fayaza, F. M. S., Senthilrajah, T., Wijesinghe, U., & Ahangama, S. (2025). Role of GenAI in Student Knowledge Enhancement: Learner Perception. 2025 5th International Conference on Advanced Research in Computing: Converging Horizons: Uniting Disciplines in Computing Research through AI Innovation, ICARC 2025 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICARC64760.2025.10963193
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology press.
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity. In British Journal of Biomedical Science (Vol. 81). Institute of Biomedical Science (IBMS). https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048
Gökoğlu, S., & Erdoğdu, F. (2025). The effects of GenAI on learning performance: A meta-analysis study. Educational Technology & Society, 28(3).
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 213–236.
Hair, J. F. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). sage.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hasim, M. A., Wei, V. W. M., & Manalan, T. (2025). Enhancing E-Learning Performance through the Integration of UTAUT, TTF and SET Models: A Conceptual Paper. Article in International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v14-i1/25085
Hizam, S. M., Akter, H., Sentosa, I., & Ahmed, W. (2021). Digital competency of educators in the virtual learning environment: A structural equation modeling analysis. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 704(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/704/1/012023
Hsiao, C. H., & Tang, K. Y. (2025). Beyond acceptance: an empirical investigation of technological, ethical, social, and individual determinants of GenAI-supported learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 10725–10750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13263-0
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
Huang, D., Hash, N., Cummings, J. J., & Prena, K. (2025). Academic cheating with generative AI: Exploring a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100424
Humida, T., Al Mamun, M. H., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2022). Predicting behavioral intention to use e-learning system: A case-study in Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2241–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9
Ittefaq, M., Zain, A., Arif, R., Ahmad, T., Khan, L., & Seo, H. (2025). Factors influencing international students’ adoption of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of International Students, 15(7), 127–154. https://doi.org/10.32674/fnwdpn48
Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N. A., & Al-Alawi, A. N. (2024). Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Technology in Society, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521
Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research: educational and psychological inquiry (Vol. 1). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Khlaif, Z. N., Ayyoub, A., Hamamra, B., Bensalem, E., Mitwally, M. A. A., Ayyoub, A., Hattab, M. K., & Shadid, F. (2024). University Teachers’ Views on the Adoption and Integration of Generative AI Tools for Student Assessment in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101090
Kim, Y., Blazquez, V., & Oh, T. (2024). Determinants of Generative AI System Adoption and Usage Behavior in Korean Companies: Applying the UTAUT Model. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111035
Kock, N. (2015). Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Krause, S., Panchal, B. H., & Ubhe, N. (2024). The Evolution of Learning: Assessing the Transformative Impact of Generative AI on Higher Education. http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10551
Kurniawan, Y., Candra, S., & Tungka, L. Y. (2021). E-Learning: MOOC User Intention Analysis Using TAM and TTF with Social Motivation Factor and MOOC Features. In E. Eilu, R. Baguma, J. S. Pettersson, & G. D. Bhutkar (Eds.), Digital Literacy and Socio-Cultural Acceptance of ICT in Developing Countries (pp. 101–117). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61089-0_7
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers and Education, 61(1), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001
Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Ma, C. Y. (2011). A model of organizational employees’ e-learning systems acceptance. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.09.005
Lenart, R., Sypniewska, B. A., Chen, J., & Janowski, K. (2025). Antecedents of students’ behavioural intention to use generative artificial intelligence: Quantitative research. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 13(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2025.130101
Liu, X., Guo, B., He, W., & Hu, X. (2025). Effects of generative artificial intelligence on K-12 and higher education students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(5), 1249-1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251329185
Ma, M. (2024). Exploring the acceptance of generative artificial intelligence for language learning among EFL postgraduate students: An extended TAM approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.
Ma, Y. (2025). Modelling college students’ acceptance to use generative artificial intelligence for second language learning: A Theory of Planned Behaviour perspective. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12923.
Nguyen, A., Duong, A. T., Nguyen, D. T. B., Lai, V. T. T., & Dang, B. (2025). Guidelines for learning design and assessment for generative artificial intelligence-integrated education: a unified view. Information and Learning Science. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-11-2024-0148
Nguyen, V. T., & Nguyen, C. T. H. (2023). The Effect of Structural Equation Modeling on Chatbot Usage: An Investigation of Dialogflow. IJAIT (International Journal of Applied Information Technology), 38. https://doi.org/10.25124/ijait.v6i01.4840
Nosrati, T., Nosrati, F., & Mashayekhi, M. (2025). Human-AI collaboration in legal services: empirical insights on task-technology fit and generative AI adoption by legal professionals. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 90(3), 305–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMAMJ-07-2025-0041
Nurtanto, M., Nawanksari, S., Sutrisno, V. L. P., Syahrudin, H., Kholifah, N., Rohmantoro, D., Utami, I. S., Mutohhari, F., & Hamid, M. A. (2025). Determinants of behavioral intentions and their impact on student performance in the use of AI technology in higher education in Indonesia: A SEM-PLS analysis based on TPB, UTAUT, and TAM frameworks. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101638
Pal, D., & Patra, S. (2021). University Students’ Perception of Video-Based Learning in Times of COVID-19: A TAM/TTF Perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(10), 903–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1848164
Parsons, C. S., Zuiderwijk, A., Orchard, N. A., Oosterhoff, J. H. F., & de Reuver, M. (2025). Task-Technology Fit of Artificial Intelligence-based clinical decision support systems: a review of qualitative studies. In BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (Vol. 25, Issue 1). BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03237-8
Perkins, M., Furze, F., Roe, J., & Macvaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. In Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (Issue 6).
Przegalinska, A., Triantoro, T., Kovbasiuk, A., Ciechanowski, L., Freeman, R. B., & Sowa, K. (2025). Collaborative AI in the workplace: Enhancing organizational performance through resource-based and task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 81, 102853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102853
Rejali, S., Aghabayk, K., Esmaeli, S., & Shiwakoti, N. (2023). Comparison of technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to assess a priori acceptance of fully automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.103565
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2024). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS. https://www.smartpls.com/
Saifi, S., Tanveer, S., Arwab, M., Lal, D., & Mirza, N. (2025). Exploring the persistence of Open AI Adoption among users in Indian higher education: A fusion of TCT and TTF model. Education and Information Technologies, 30(9), 12055–12078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13282-x
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
Schiavo, G., Businaro, S., & Zancanaro, M. (2024). Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial Intelligence. Technology in Society, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102537
Smolansky, A., Cram, A., Raduescu, C., Zeivots, S., Huber, E., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2023). Educator and Student Perspectives on the Impact of Generative AI on Assessments in Higher Education. L@S 2023 - Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3596191
Song, Y., Qiu, X., & Liu, J. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Adoption on Organizational Decision-Making: An Empirical Study Based on the Technology Acceptance Model in Business Management. Systems, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080683
Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. (2024). The ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. International Journal of Information Management, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700
Tubella, A. A., Mora-Cantallops, M., & Nieves, J. C. (2024). How to teach responsible AI in Higher Education: challenges and opportunities. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09733-7
Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., İslamoğlu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025). Rethinking the importance of social norms in generative AI adoption: investigating the acceptance and use of generative AI among higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00535-z
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.
Verma, S., Kashive, N., & Gupta, A. (2025). Examining predictors of generative-AI acceptance and usage in academic research: a sequential mixed-methods approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2024-0564
Wang, C., Chen, Y., Hu, Z., Li, Y., & Gu, X. (2025). The journey of challenges and victories: exploring the transformation action framework in the GenAI era from multifaceted policies. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10535-5
Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., Dai, J., Gu, X., & Yu, T. (2024). Factors Influencing University Students’ Behavioral Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence: Integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and AI Literacy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(11), 6649–6671. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2383033
Wang, Y., Dong, C., & Zhang, X. (2020). Improving MOOC learning performance in China: An analysis of factors from the TAM and TPB. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1421–1433. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22310
Wang, Y., Wei, Z., Wijaya, T. T., Cao, Y., & Ning, Y. (2025). Awareness, acceptance, and adoption of Gen-AI by K-12 mathematics teachers: an empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 478. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02781-2
Weng, X., Xia, Q., Gu, M., Rajaram, K., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). Assessment and learning outcomes for generative AI in higher education: A scoping review on current research status and trends. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 40.
Wijayanti, P., Mohamed, I. S., & Daud, D. (2024). Computerized accounting information systems: An application of task technology fit model for microfinance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100224
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
Wu, H., & Dong, Z. (2025). What Motivates Second Language Majors to Use Generative AI for Informal Learning? Insights From the Theory of Planned Behavior. IEEE Access, 13, 34877–34886. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3544489
Zhang, R., & Wang, J. (2025). Perceptions, adoption intentions, and impacts of generative AI among Chinese university students. Current Psychology, 44(11), 11276–11295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07928-3
Zlotnikova, I., Hlomani, H., Mokgetse, T., & Bagai, K. (2025). Establishing ethical standards for GenAI in university education: a roadmap for academic integrity and fairness. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 23(2), 188–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-07-2024-0104
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Technology in Education and Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
