Integrating Web 2.0 Tools into Science Teaching: Implications for Conceptual Understanding and Student Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.5498

Keywords:

Conduction of electricity, Web 2.0, Conceptual understanding

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a guiding material supported by Web 2.0 tools for the “Conduction of Electricity” unit in the 6th grade science course and to examine conceptual learning and student opinions about the process. The action research method, one of the qualitative research designs, was used in the study. The sample of the study consisted of 21 6th grade students. A Conceptual Understanding Test consisting of 15 open-ended questions developed by the researcher and a semi-structured interview consisting of 5 open-ended questions were used as data collection tools. According to the results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test conducted on the conceptual understanding pre- and post-test scores, a statistically significant difference was obtained (z=-4.02, p<.05). After further analysis of the conceptual understanding test, it was determined that students made significant progress from the "No Understanding" level to the "Complete Understanding" level on the basis of all acquisitions; interactive and student-centered teaching practices supported by Web 2.0 tools strengthened conceptual understanding. In addition, student opinions reveal that Web 2.0 tools contribute positively not only to academic achievement but also to students' attitudes towards learning, class participation, digital competence, and interdisciplinary skills.

References

Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310206

Acet, İ., & Akyüz, H. İ. (2020). The effect of student- content İnteraction on students’ academic achievement and attitude towards science. Online Science Education Journal, 5(1), 21–31. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ofed/issue/55027/681327

Akbaba, K. (2019). The effect of web 2.0 applications in science teaching on students' attitudes towards science and technology use. (Master thesis). Aksaray University, Aksaray.

Alp, G. (2019). The impact of scratch program and web assisted cooperative learning method on the level of conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills of 5th grade students. (Master thesis). Bursa Uludag University, Bursa.

Arslan, K., & Yildirim, M. (2021) Effect of online science course supported with web 2.0 tools on the academic achievement of fifth grade students and student opinions. Science Education International 32(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i4.6

Baki, Y. (2022). The Effect of Web 2.0 tools on the development of digital literacy skills and webpedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 10(3), 671-695. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.1109642

Bolatlı, Z., & Korucu, A. T. (2018). Secondary school students' feedback on course processing and collaborative learning with Web 2.0 tools-supported STEM activities. Bartın University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(2), 456-478. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.358488

Can, B. (2021). The effect of web 2.0 supported conceptual cartoon use on academic success and attitude in science course. (Master thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. Falmer Press.

Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of web 2.0 tools in higher education. A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy.

Corey, S. M. (1953). Action research to improve school practices. Teachers College Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cıtak, M. (2023). The effect of Web 2.0 tools on the attitudes of 5th grade students success and environmental pollution: The example of human and environmental unit. (Master thesis). Canakkale On sekiz Mart University, Canakkale.

Demirezer, G. (2022). The effect of science teaching based on 5E model with Web 2.0 support on students' academic success, visual literacy level and spatial visualization skills. (Master thesis). Bursa Uludag University, Bursa.

Efe, H., Turan, H., & Topsakal, Ü. U. (2022). Developing secondary school students’ 21st century skills through online science education with Web 2.0 tools. Journal of Human and Social Sciences (JOHASS), 5(2), 206–229.

Ekemen, M. (2022). The effect of education information network (EBA) and experimental supported activities on the teaching of the 7th grade electrical circuits unit). International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(2), 365–380.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Günaydın, M. (2019). The effect of teaching with V diagrams on conceptual meanings of 6th grade students: The transmission of electricity unit. (Master thesis). Trabzon University, Trabzon.

Gürleroğlu, L. (2019). Investigation of the effect of science teaching on student achievement, attitude to motivation and digital literacy performed with web 2.0 applications suitable for 5E model. (Master thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul.

Gürleroğlu, L., & Yildirim, M. (2022). Investigation of secondary school students' vıews on Web 2.0 supported educational web site. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 191–217. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.776977

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Ivanjek, L., Morris, L., Schubatzky, T., Hopf, M., Burde, J. P., Haagen-Schützenhöfer, C., Dopatka, L., Spatz, V., & Wilhelm, T. (2021). Development of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 20123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020123

Kazaklı, T. (2020). The effect of non-class activities on secondary school students 'academic success and motivation for science learning. (Master thesis). Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University Press.

Korkut, H. M., Mantaş, H.C.Ö., & Yildirim, M. (2021) Analysis of the effect of use of Web 2.0 tools in online science courses on students achievements and digital literacy. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 44.

Köse, Ö. Ö., Bayram, H., & Benzer, E. (2021). The effect of Web 2.0 tools supported argumentation applications on middle school students’ achievements, technology and argumentative attitudes on force and energy topic. Erciyes Journal of Education (EJE), 5(2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.32433/eje.913505

Kriek, J and Gaigher, E. (2006). Investigation of pre-service teacher’s understanding of ohm’s law. Conference: Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, At Maputo, Mozambique.

Turkish Ministry of National Education (MoNE). (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli Öğretim Programı Taslağı. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları. https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/ogretim-programlari/fen-bilimleri-dersi

Ortaakarsu, F., & Sülün, Y. (2022). The effect of web 2.0 tools on motivation ın the science lesson DNA and genetic code unit: Kahoot! example. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 62, 617–639. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1076079

Önal, N. (2022). “Öğretimde Kullanılabilecek Teknoloji Destekli Uygulamalar”. N. Önal (Ed.). Eğitimde Teknoloji Uygulamaları (pp. 2-14). Ankara :Pegem Akademi.

Sarı, E. (2019). Investigation of the effectiveness of mobile learning supported science course. (Master thesis). Düzce University, Düzce.

Sarıkaya, D., & Aydın, A. (2021). The effect of Education Information Network EBA and experimental supported activities on the teaching of the 7th Grade Electrical Circuits unit. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 9(2), 265–310.

Stringer, E. T. (2014). Action research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Timur, S., Yılmaz, Ş., & Küçük, D. (2021). Investigation of the effects of Web 2.0 applications on the self-efficacy beliefs of science teacher candidates. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 291-311.

Uysal, M. Z. (2020). The effect of using web 2.0 animation tools in the science course for 4th grade students on various variables. (Master thesis). Nigde Ömer Halisdemir University, Nigde.

Wankel C., & Blessinger P. (2013. Increasing Student Engagement and Retention in E-Learning Environments : Web 2.0 and Blended Learning Technologies (1th ed.). Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK.

Yazıcıoğlu, Ş., Benzer, E., & Yildirim, M. (2023). Investigation of the effects of Web 2.0 supported socioscientific issues on secondary school students' environmental ethics perceptions. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (14), 327-350. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.1222968

Yildiz, E., Aggül, Ö., Çalıklar, Ş., & Şimsek, Ü. (2020). Eğitsel oyun ve işbirlikli öğrenmenin 6.sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarına, sosyal becerilerine ve öğrenme motivasyonlarına etkisi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(6), 1703–1716.

Yildirim, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Publications.

Yildirim, M., & Şimşek, U. (2023). The situation of social studies teachers using technology in their lessons. The International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies (IJONASS), 7(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.1243244

Yildirim, İ. (2020). 7An investigation of effect of the use of web 2.0 tools on students' academic achievement, levels of self-directed learning with technology and attitudes towards science in the interaction of light and matter unit in 7th grade. (Master thesis). Kocaeli University, Kocaeli.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Integrating Web 2.0 Tools into Science Teaching: Implications for Conceptual Understanding and Student Perspectives. (2026). International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 10(2), 275-294. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.5498